Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2400
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Google Tensor and Samsung Exynos 2400 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (2800 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (October 2021 vs January 2024)
Basic
Google
Label Name
Samsung
October 2021
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9845
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP20
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
848 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
2.1709 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
20
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
-
Miscellaneous
Tensor Processing Unit
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
5.6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor
1319
Exynos 2400
2080
+58%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor
3234
Exynos 2400
6582
+104%
AnTuTu 10
Tensor
813782
Exynos 2400
1698761
+109%
