Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2200
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Google Tensor and Samsung Exynos 2200 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2022 (October 2021 vs January 2022)
Basic
Google
Label Name
Samsung
October 2021
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9845
Model Name
S5E9925
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP20
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
848 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
2.1709 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
640
20
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
Miscellaneous
Tensor Processing Unit
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
5.6 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor
1319
Exynos 2200
1594
+21%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor
3234
Exynos 2200
3685
+14%
AnTuTu 10
Tensor
813782
Exynos 2200
902026
+11%
FP32 (float)
Tensor
2213
Exynos 2200
3172
+43%
