Apple A15 Bionic
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Apple A15 Bionic
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3230 MHz (3230 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (September 2021 vs January 2024)
Basic
Apple
Label Name
Samsung
September 2021
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
APL1W07
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche, 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
6
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3230 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
15
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Apple A15 GPU
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1338 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
1.7126 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
-
5
Execution units
-
2732 x 2048
Max display resolution
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.5-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
A15 Bionic
2333
+12%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A15 Bionic
5741
Exynos 2400
6582
+15%
AnTuTu 10
A15 Bionic
1315838
Exynos 2400
1698761
+29%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
6997
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
8667
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Solar Bay
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3786
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
267
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
214
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3275
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3859
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Wild Life
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
9445
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
2960
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
11604
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/en/soc/compare/apple-a15-bionic-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>