Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

vs

SoC-Vergleichsergebnis

Nachfolgend finden Sie die Ergebnisse eines Vergleichs von Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 und Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 mobile Prozessoren basierend auf wichtigen Leistungsmerkmalen sowie Stromverbrauch und vielem mehr.

Vorteile

  • Höher Frequenz: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 3000 MHz)
  • Neuer Erscheinungsdatum: November 2022 (November 2022 vs December 2021)

Basic

Qualcomm
Markenname
Qualcomm
November 2022
Erscheinungsdatum
December 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Plattform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Herstellung
Samsung
SM8550-AB
Modellname
SM8450
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architektur
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Kerne
8
4 nm
Prozess
4 nm
3200 MHz
Frequenz
3000 MHz

GPU-Spezifikationen

Adreno 740
GPU-Name
Adreno 730
680 MHz
GPU-Frequenz
818 MHz
3.4816 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.5128 TFLOPS
1280
Shader-Einheiten
768
2
Ausführungseinheiten
2
2.0
OpenCL Version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan-Version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Maximale Anzeigeauflösung
3840 x 2160
12.1
DirectX-Version
12.1

Konnektivität

Up to 10000 Mbps
Download-Geschwindigkeit
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G-Unterstützung
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G Unterstützung
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Speicherspezifikationen

LPDDR5X
Speichertypen
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Speicherfrequenz
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit

Verschiedenes

1 MB
L2-Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio Codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Maximale Kamerareolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Speichertyp
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Videoaufnahme
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video Codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video-Wiedergabe
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6.3 W
TDP
5.3 W
ARMv9-A
Befehlssatz
ARMv9-A
Hexagon
Neuronaler Prozessor (NPU)
Hexagon

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Einzelkern
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993 +20%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1664
Geekbench 6 Mehrkern
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328 +32%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4030
Geekbench 5 Einzelkern
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
528
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
623 +18%
Geekbench 5 Mehrkern
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1761
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2142 +22%
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3411 +39%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2462
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1550709 +41%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1096529
AiTuTu 3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1143842 +43%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
800624

Vergleich von Geräten

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10505
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
11920
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
790
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1185
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
736
3DMark Wild Life
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
13757
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9565
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3860
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2548
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
14583
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10361
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
33310
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
13969
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3713
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2539