CPU Comparison Result
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Similar Zen 4 Processors with Different Positioning
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 and Ryzen 7 7840HS may appear to be processors from different generations, but in reality, they are very similar solutions. Both chips are built on the Zen 4 architecture, feature 8 cores and 16 threads, 16 MB of L3 cache, and powerful integrated Radeon 780M graphics.
The main difference lies not in performance class but in the details. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is formally stronger: it has a higher boost, a slightly faster Radeon 780M, and includes a Ryzen AI block. The Ryzen 7 H 255 is simpler, but in a mini-PC with good cooling, it can deliver nearly the same level of CPU performance.
Short Summary
Ryzen 7 7840HS is a more versatile option. It is slightly faster in single-threaded tasks, has a higher frequency Radeon 780M, and supports Ryzen AI.
Ryzen 7 H 255 is a close CPU with 8-core Zen 4 without NPU. It is appealing if the device is cheaper or if it's a mini-PC with good cooling.
Under equal conditions, the Ryzen 7 7840HS is generally preferable. However, if the Ryzen 7 H 255 is significantly cheaper, the extra cost for the 7840HS may not always be justified.
Key Differences
| Specification | Ryzen 7 H 255 | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 |
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost | up to 4.9 GHz | up to 5.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| TDP / cTDP | 45 W / 35-54 W | 35-54 W |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M, 12 CU, up to 2600 MHz | Radeon 780M, 12 CU, up to 2700 MHz |
| Ryzen AI / NPU | No | Yes, up to 10 TOPS |
| Positioning | Laptops and mini-PCs for the Chinese market | Laptops for the global market |
The frequency difference is small. The Ryzen 7 7840HS has a maximum CPU boost that is about 4% higher, and its integrated graphics frequency is also about 4% higher. In everyday tasks, this is hardly noticeable, but in short single-threaded workloads, benchmarks, and games on integrated graphics, the 7840HS may be a bit faster.
CPU Performance
In terms of CPU performance, these chips belong to the same class. Both have 8 fast Zen 4 cores and 16 threads, making them well-suited for browsing, office tasks, programming, photo editing, handling multiple tabs, and moderately heavy workloads.
In multi-threaded workloads, the difference between them is usually minimal. The Ryzen 7 7840HS may be slightly faster due to its higher boost, but the final result greatly depends on the specific laptop or mini-PC involved.
| Test | Ryzen 7 H 255 | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 Multi | around 16100 | around 16300 | almost parity |
| Cinebench R23 Single | around 1710 | around 1770 | 7840HS somewhat faster |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | around 12600-12700 | around 12900 | small difference |
| Geekbench 6 Single | around 2550 | around 2660 | advantage of 7840HS more noticeable |
In practice, this means a simple thing: if comparing two similarly cooled devices, the Ryzen 7 7840HS will generally be slightly faster. But if the Ryzen 7 H 255 is installed in a mini-PC with good power and cooling, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS is in a thin laptop with strict limits, the real difference may become minimal.
Integrated Graphics Radeon 780M
Both processors feature the Radeon 780M, which is one of AMD's most successful integrated graphics solutions for its generation. While it is not a replacement for a discrete graphics card, the level of performance for an iGPU is very respectable.
Radeon 780M is suitable for:
- eSports gaming;
- older AAA titles;
- modern games at low settings;
- hardware video acceleration;
- working with multiple monitors.
The Ryzen 7 7840HS features a higher iGPU frequency: up to 2700 MHz compared to 2600 MHz for the Ryzen 7 H 255. However, in real gaming scenarios, not only the graphics frequency matters but also the memory. Fast LPDDR5X may benefit the Radeon 780M more than an additional 100 MHz of frequency.
If the device is being purchased specifically for gaming without a discrete graphics card, the Ryzen 7 7840HS is slightly preferable. However, the differences between specific laptops or mini-PCs may be more significant than the differences between the processors themselves.
Ryzen AI: The Advantage of Ryzen 7 7840HS
The most noticeable functional difference is the presence of an NPU. The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes a Ryzen AI block with a performance of up to 10 TOPS. The Ryzen 7 H 255 does not have this block.
For regular use, the absence of an NPU is not an issue. Browsers, office applications, coding, photo and video editing, movies, YouTube, and gaming will work fine on both processors. However, if local AI functions, acceleration of certain neural network tasks, and future-proofing for Windows and application capabilities are important, the Ryzen 7 7840HS becomes more attractive.
Still, it is essential not to overestimate the Ryzen AI in the 7840HS. It is a useful bonus but not a primary selling point for most users. In terms of CPU and integrated graphics, these processors remain very close.
Why Ryzen 7 H 255 is Interesting in Mini-PCs
The Ryzen 7 H 255 is particularly interesting in mini-PCs. In compact desktop systems, cooling and power delivery are often more stable than in thin laptops, allowing the processor to maintain high frequencies for longer.
In this format, the Ryzen 7 H 255 can appear very compelling. Yes, it lacks Ryzen AI and has slightly lower frequencies than the Ryzen 7 7840HS. However, if the mini-PC is configured without aggressive power limitations, the actual performance may be nearly the same.
Therefore, when choosing, it is crucial to consider not only the processor name but also the device itself:
- what power limit is set by the manufacturer;
- how effective the cooling system is;
- what type of memory is installed;
- the possibility of upgrades;
- how noisy the system is under load;
- the final price.
What to Choose
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is best suited if you need the most versatile option without compromises. It is slightly faster, features Ryzen AI, and is more frequently found in well-known laptops in the global market.
The Ryzen 7 H 255 is better considered if the device is significantly cheaper or if it pertains to a mini-PC with good cooling. In terms of CPU performance, it is very close to the 7840HS, and the lack of Ryzen AI will not be critical for many users.
| Scenario | Best Choice |
|---|---|
| Laptop at the same price | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Mini-PC with good cooling | Ryzen 7 H 255 |
| Gaming on integrated graphics | Ryzen 7 7840HS, but difference is small |
| Work, browsing, coding, office | both are suitable |
| Local AI functions | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Maximum value for money | Ryzen 7 H 255, if cheaper |
Conclusion
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is formally better: it has a higher boost, a faster Radeon 780M, and includes Ryzen AI. It is a more complete and versatile processor.
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 is not a weak alternative, but rather an almost equivalent 8-core Zen 4 with minor limitations. Its main drawback is the lack of NPU and slightly lower frequencies. The main advantage is price: in a mini-PC with good cooling, it can deliver nearly the same level of performance for less money.
If the prices are equal and the devices are similar in quality, it makes sense to choose the Ryzen 7 7840HS. If the Ryzen 7 H 255 is significantly cheaper or is in a well-configured mini-PC, it can be a more cost-effective purchase.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (January 2025 vs October 2023)
Basic
CPU Specifications
Memory Specifications
GPU Specifications
Miscellaneous
Benchmarks
Related CPU Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/cpu/compare/amd-ryzen-7-h-255-vs-amd-ryzen-7-7840hs" target="_blank">AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS</a>